Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38781 - 38790 of 50524 for our.
Search results 38781 - 38790 of 50524 for our.
CA Blank Order
exercise of the circuit court’s sentencing discretion. Upon our independent review of the record, we have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104665 - 2013-11-18
exercise of the circuit court’s sentencing discretion. Upon our independent review of the record, we have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104665 - 2013-11-18
State v. Emmanuel Pettis
was unemployed did not conflict with his defense strategy that the drugs in the car belonged to his brother. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5738 - 2005-03-31
was unemployed did not conflict with his defense strategy that the drugs in the car belonged to his brother. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5738 - 2005-03-31
County of Rusk v. Keith R. Aussem
testimony at the suppression hearing, are unchallenged. The scope of our review of the trial court’s legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5736 - 2005-03-31
testimony at the suppression hearing, are unchallenged. The scope of our review of the trial court’s legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5736 - 2005-03-31
State v. Patrick E. Fritz
and determine the reasonableness of the officer’s conduct. Id. In our analysis, we accept the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3040 - 2005-03-31
and determine the reasonableness of the officer’s conduct. Id. In our analysis, we accept the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3040 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
to determine the amount and duration of maintenance, our review is limited to considering “whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133088 - 2015-01-20
to determine the amount and duration of maintenance, our review is limited to considering “whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133088 - 2015-01-20
COURT OF APPEALS
that Schnell has forfeited this argument. Our review of the record reveals that Schnell did not make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146650 - 2015-08-19
that Schnell has forfeited this argument. Our review of the record reveals that Schnell did not make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146650 - 2015-08-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to assure the admission of the Facebook messages. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333383 - 2021-02-09
to assure the admission of the Facebook messages. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333383 - 2021-02-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on inaccurate information at sentencing. Our independent review of the record reveals no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139181 - 2017-09-21
on inaccurate information at sentencing. Our independent review of the record reveals no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139181 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
supporting an inference that Follett’s refusal to pay the commissions was retaliatory. Further, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33514 - 2014-09-15
supporting an inference that Follett’s refusal to pay the commissions was retaliatory. Further, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33514 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Ralph C. Haralson
considerations. We cannot conclude that the sentence is unduly harsh or excessive. Our review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8500 - 2017-09-19
considerations. We cannot conclude that the sentence is unduly harsh or excessive. Our review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8500 - 2017-09-19