Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3881 - 3890 of 63339 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3881 - 3890 of 63339 for Motion for joint custody.
Milwaukee County v. Delores M.
from the trial court's denial of her motion to dismiss Milwaukee County's petition to commit her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11355 - 2005-03-31
from the trial court's denial of her motion to dismiss Milwaukee County's petition to commit her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11355 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Milwaukee County v. Delores M.
denial of her motion to dismiss Milwaukee County's petition to commit her pursuant to Chapter 51
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11355 - 2017-09-19
denial of her motion to dismiss Milwaukee County's petition to commit her pursuant to Chapter 51
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11355 - 2017-09-19
Laura K. Waterhouse v. Thomas A. Waterhouse
a motion contesting custody and visitation issues, and the support modification motion was placed on hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18094 - 2005-05-09
a motion contesting custody and visitation issues, and the support modification motion was placed on hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18094 - 2005-05-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). 5 In May 2020, Schneider filed a pro se motion seeking sentence credit in this case for in-custody
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277008 - 2020-08-12
). 5 In May 2020, Schneider filed a pro se motion seeking sentence credit in this case for in-custody
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277008 - 2020-08-12
COURT OF APPEALS
) (2007-08).[2] On appeal, Allen challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54389 - 2010-09-13
) (2007-08).[2] On appeal, Allen challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54389 - 2010-09-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
Martin J. Donald presided over the suppression motion that is the focus of this appeal. The Honorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54389 - 2014-09-15
Martin J. Donald presided over the suppression motion that is the focus of this appeal. The Honorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54389 - 2014-09-15
State v. Eric L. Tolonen
because their defenses were antagonistic. We conclude that it was not error to deny the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7363 - 2005-03-31
because their defenses were antagonistic. We conclude that it was not error to deny the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7363 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Eric L. Tolonen
that it was not error to deny the motion for severance. We affirm the judgment. No. 04-0658-CR 2 ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7363 - 2017-09-20
that it was not error to deny the motion for severance. We affirm the judgment. No. 04-0658-CR 2 ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7363 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
; and (5) “concerted action/joint enterprise,” which generally alleged that Transport and All Star worked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=313068 - 2020-12-10
; and (5) “concerted action/joint enterprise,” which generally alleged that Transport and All Star worked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=313068 - 2020-12-10
[PDF]
State v. Todd E. Crider
. Todd E. Crider appeals from a judgment and an order denying his postconviction motion to vacate his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15465 - 2017-09-21
. Todd E. Crider appeals from a judgment and an order denying his postconviction motion to vacate his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15465 - 2017-09-21