Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3881 - 3890 of 12432 for mr.
Search results 3881 - 3890 of 12432 for mr.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that “Mr. Sorenson’s objective is not to withdraw his plea. Rather, he only wants a lesser sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107627 - 2017-09-21
that “Mr. Sorenson’s objective is not to withdraw his plea. Rather, he only wants a lesser sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107627 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
presented by the parties, the court found the following. The second man “got into Mr. Tesch’s face
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90615 - 2014-09-15
presented by the parties, the court found the following. The second man “got into Mr. Tesch’s face
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90615 - 2014-09-15
State v. Derrick Emerson
. THE COURT: The charge against you, Mr. Emerson, is that on the 12th of August of this past year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6737 - 2005-03-31
. THE COURT: The charge against you, Mr. Emerson, is that on the 12th of August of this past year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6737 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the following exchange: THE COURT: Okay. Mr. Procknow, I’ve had – been provided by your attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34263 - 2008-10-08
the following exchange: THE COURT: Okay. Mr. Procknow, I’ve had – been provided by your attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34263 - 2008-10-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be given greater weight, as he was “the agent who actually monitored Mr. Manns and is much more familiar
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117400 - 2017-09-21
be given greater weight, as he was “the agent who actually monitored Mr. Manns and is much more familiar
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117400 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The court found, “in regards to the Defendant’s decision not to testify, that Mr. Walsh never told
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244858 - 2019-08-05
. The court found, “in regards to the Defendant’s decision not to testify, that Mr. Walsh never told
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244858 - 2019-08-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
or concurrent, it appeared to me at that time after I made the offer in good belief that Mr. Xiong had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30097 - 2014-09-15
or concurrent, it appeared to me at that time after I made the offer in good belief that Mr. Xiong had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30097 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
principal” and had identified herself using a fictitious name. Finally, the letter stated: I believe Mrs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30731 - 2007-10-29
principal” and had identified herself using a fictitious name. Finally, the letter stated: I believe Mrs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30731 - 2007-10-29
COURT OF APPEALS
whatever fine was imposed. ¶4 The trial court ruled: All right. At this time Mr. Cooper is here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26706 - 2006-10-09
whatever fine was imposed. ¶4 The trial court ruled: All right. At this time Mr. Cooper is here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26706 - 2006-10-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
assistance “was not ineffective for Mr. Wilson with respect to the dismissed charges. It was not deficient
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=345091 - 2021-03-11
assistance “was not ineffective for Mr. Wilson with respect to the dismissed charges. It was not deficient
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=345091 - 2021-03-11