Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3881 - 3890 of 6141 for sheriff.
Search results 3881 - 3890 of 6141 for sheriff.
Rule Order
commissioner. (f) "Sworn officer" means a deputy sheriff or police officer. (g) "Court security officer
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79669 - 2012-03-14
commissioner. (f) "Sworn officer" means a deputy sheriff or police officer. (g) "Court security officer
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79669 - 2012-03-14
[PDF]
WI 25
" means a circuit court judge or court commissioner. (f) "Sworn officer" means a deputy sheriff
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79669 - 2014-09-15
" means a circuit court judge or court commissioner. (f) "Sworn officer" means a deputy sheriff
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79669 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 25
" means a circuit court judge or court commissioner. (f) "Sworn officer" means a deputy sheriff
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79669 - 2014-09-15
" means a circuit court judge or court commissioner. (f) "Sworn officer" means a deputy sheriff
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79669 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
and that he had called the Kenosha County sheriff about executing the writ. Attorney Lister, however, never
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29091 - 2007-05-16
and that he had called the Kenosha County sheriff about executing the writ. Attorney Lister, however, never
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29091 - 2007-05-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
County Sheriff’s Department (the department) testified regarding the events that led to Chris’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=561039 - 2022-08-30
County Sheriff’s Department (the department) testified regarding the events that led to Chris’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=561039 - 2022-08-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
County Sheriff’s Department (the department) testified regarding the events that led to Chris’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=561036 - 2022-08-30
County Sheriff’s Department (the department) testified regarding the events that led to Chris’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=561036 - 2022-08-30
State v. Patrick E. Richter
were sufficiently exigent to justify it. The circumstances were these: a Marinette County sheriff's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17398 - 2005-03-31
were sufficiently exigent to justify it. The circumstances were these: a Marinette County sheriff's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17398 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gary L. Gordon
in person on November 2nd, 1998 by a Milwaukee County Deputy Sheriff.” The court also referred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4104 - 2005-03-31
in person on November 2nd, 1998 by a Milwaukee County Deputy Sheriff.” The court also referred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4104 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dennis J. Reitter
the facts are not in dispute. On Wednesday afternoon, December 18, 1996, Racine County Deputy Sheriff
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17383 - 2005-03-31
the facts are not in dispute. On Wednesday afternoon, December 18, 1996, Racine County Deputy Sheriff
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17383 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
, a sheriff's deputy instructed hospital staff to perform a warrantless blood draw. Tullberg argues
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132201 - 2015-02-09
, a sheriff's deputy instructed hospital staff to perform a warrantless blood draw. Tullberg argues
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132201 - 2015-02-09