Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38801 - 38810 of 97585 for court records search online.
Search results 38801 - 38810 of 97585 for court records search online.
State v. Marques D. Miller
of the scheduled trial. ¶19 Second, the record as found by the trial court, contradicts Miller’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7068 - 2008-03-31
of the scheduled trial. ¶19 Second, the record as found by the trial court, contradicts Miller’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7068 - 2008-03-31
[PDF]
Susan K. Kuykendall v. Kelly R. Kuykendall
-2781 3 ¶6 In addition, Susan argues that the record does not contain any comments by the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16142 - 2017-09-21
-2781 3 ¶6 In addition, Susan argues that the record does not contain any comments by the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16142 - 2017-09-21
Susan K. Kuykendall v. Kelly R. Kuykendall
of the record. At the hearing on the reconsideration motion, when counsel attempted to remind the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16142 - 2005-03-31
of the record. At the hearing on the reconsideration motion, when counsel attempted to remind the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16142 - 2005-03-31
Ronald Collison v. City of Milwaukee Board of Review
not review the conclusion of the court; rather, we review the record before the board and its decision. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5441 - 2005-03-31
not review the conclusion of the court; rather, we review the record before the board and its decision. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5441 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ronald Collison v. City of Milwaukee Board of Review
to an administrative board’s decision, we do not review the conclusion of the court; rather, we review the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5441 - 2017-09-19
to an administrative board’s decision, we do not review the conclusion of the court; rather, we review the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5441 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Case of the month - February 2012
understood. The court ruled that any failure to orally warn Negrete on the record was harmless error
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/feb12.pdf - 2012-01-31
understood. The court ruled that any failure to orally warn Negrete on the record was harmless error
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/feb12.pdf - 2012-01-31
State v. Mark L. Dryden
submitted. Although that document is not of record, the court described it as: (1) increasing the amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14757 - 2005-03-31
submitted. Although that document is not of record, the court described it as: (1) increasing the amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14757 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark L. Dryden
that had been submitted. Although that document is not of record, the court described it as: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14757 - 2017-09-21
that had been submitted. Although that document is not of record, the court described it as: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14757 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Mark V. Reid
. This court reviewed the record and concluded that the trial court did not misuse its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10037 - 2017-09-19
. This court reviewed the record and concluded that the trial court did not misuse its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10037 - 2017-09-19
State v. Mark V. Reid
. This court reviewed the record and concluded that the trial court did not misuse its discretion at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10037 - 2005-03-31
. This court reviewed the record and concluded that the trial court did not misuse its discretion at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10037 - 2005-03-31