Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38811 - 38820 of 51986 for legal separation.
Search results 38811 - 38820 of 51986 for legal separation.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a sufficient factual or legal basis to keep either this decision or the motion sealed. We decline to hold
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995053 - 2025-08-14
a sufficient factual or legal basis to keep either this decision or the motion sealed. We decline to hold
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995053 - 2025-08-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the sentences are within the legal maximum. As to discretionary issues, the No. 2024AP679-CRNM 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996563 - 2025-08-14
, the sentences are within the legal maximum. As to discretionary issues, the No. 2024AP679-CRNM 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996563 - 2025-08-14
State v. Richard Boho
with accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record.’” Lievrouw v. Roth, 157 Wis.2d 332
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11611 - 2005-03-31
with accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record.’” Lievrouw v. Roth, 157 Wis.2d 332
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11611 - 2005-03-31
William N. Ledford v. William Noland
legal action. Ledford then filed his certiorari petition in mid-January 1999. ¶5 On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15683 - 2005-03-31
legal action. Ledford then filed his certiorari petition in mid-January 1999. ¶5 On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15683 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dean C. Trepanier
if Trepanier were medically fit for ERP, it still would have found him ineligible based on his “multiple legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26060 - 2006-07-31
if Trepanier were medically fit for ERP, it still would have found him ineligible based on his “multiple legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26060 - 2006-07-31
COURT OF APPEALS
how his prior training and experience gave him the ability to differentiate between legally tinted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131706 - 2014-12-15
how his prior training and experience gave him the ability to differentiate between legally tinted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131706 - 2014-12-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, and a subsequent investigation resulted in a citation for OWI. ¶3 Rose challenged the legality of her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113387 - 2014-06-03
, and a subsequent investigation resulted in a citation for OWI. ¶3 Rose challenged the legality of her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113387 - 2014-06-03
COURT OF APPEALS
%, higher than the preliminary breath test and above the legal limit. Further, after Ford’s counsel stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32797 - 2015-08-12
%, higher than the preliminary breath test and above the legal limit. Further, after Ford’s counsel stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32797 - 2015-08-12
Village of Oregon v. Robyn R. Sunday
) there were no published cases addressing the legal question at issue. Id. at 275-76. ¶5 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4305 - 2006-07-04
) there were no published cases addressing the legal question at issue. Id. at 275-76. ¶5 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4305 - 2006-07-04
COURT OF APPEALS
for the board’s, applied the wrong definition of “hardship,” and applied an incorrect legal standard. The board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36659 - 2009-06-01
for the board’s, applied the wrong definition of “hardship,” and applied an incorrect legal standard. The board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36659 - 2009-06-01