Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38811 - 38820 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 38811 - 38820 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Northwoods Care Vans, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services
and then to the trial court who affirmed the hearing examiner. Northwoods argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10860 - 2005-03-31
and then to the trial court who affirmed the hearing examiner. Northwoods argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10860 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are to the 2011-12 version. No. 2013AP859-FT 2 At the time of the divorce trial, Knoke
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103415 - 2017-09-21
are to the 2011-12 version. No. 2013AP859-FT 2 At the time of the divorce trial, Knoke
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103415 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the trial court’s findings regarding the $1,350 in costs and attorney’s fees were clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27497 - 2014-09-15
that the trial court’s findings regarding the $1,350 in costs and attorney’s fees were clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27497 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Donald R. Wooden
the judgment of conviction before the trial court, we disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND On October 28, 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13619 - 2017-09-21
the judgment of conviction before the trial court, we disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND On October 28, 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13619 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
complains that his trial counsel failed to investigate a potential defense they discussed to the charge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248933 - 2019-10-23
complains that his trial counsel failed to investigate a potential defense they discussed to the charge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248933 - 2019-10-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
with the raze order as No. 2008AP2136 2 required under WIS. STAT. § 66.0413(1)(d),1 the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43612 - 2014-09-15
with the raze order as No. 2008AP2136 2 required under WIS. STAT. § 66.0413(1)(d),1 the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43612 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
current postconviction motion, Hicks alleges that at the time of his pleas his trial counsel told him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288416 - 2020-09-17
current postconviction motion, Hicks alleges that at the time of his pleas his trial counsel told him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288416 - 2020-09-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this was his understanding of the plea agreement. 3 During the plea hearing, trial counsel advised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307029 - 2020-11-24
that this was his understanding of the plea agreement. 3 During the plea hearing, trial counsel advised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307029 - 2020-11-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the burglary victim and Miller’s girlfriend. The burglary occurred on May 14, 2012. At trial, the victim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122766 - 2014-10-01
the burglary victim and Miller’s girlfriend. The burglary occurred on May 14, 2012. At trial, the victim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122766 - 2014-10-01
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 11, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
of constitutional fact which we decide independently of the trial court’s determination. Id. at 249. The factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26679 - 2006-10-10
of constitutional fact which we decide independently of the trial court’s determination. Id. at 249. The factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26679 - 2006-10-10