Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38821 - 38830 of 97621 for court records search online.
Search results 38821 - 38830 of 97621 for court records search online.
State v. Mark L. Dryden
submitted. Although that document is not of record, the court described it as: (1) increasing the amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14757 - 2005-03-31
submitted. Although that document is not of record, the court described it as: (1) increasing the amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14757 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark L. Dryden
that had been submitted. Although that document is not of record, the court described it as: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14757 - 2017-09-21
that had been submitted. Although that document is not of record, the court described it as: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14757 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Mark V. Reid
. This court reviewed the record and concluded that the trial court did not misuse its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10037 - 2017-09-19
. This court reviewed the record and concluded that the trial court did not misuse its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10037 - 2017-09-19
State v. Mark V. Reid
. This court reviewed the record and concluded that the trial court did not misuse its discretion at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10037 - 2005-03-31
. This court reviewed the record and concluded that the trial court did not misuse its discretion at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10037 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
), and that the court failed to adequately explain its rationale on the record. In its written order denying Carr’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91469 - 2013-01-15
), and that the court failed to adequately explain its rationale on the record. In its written order denying Carr’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91469 - 2013-01-15
[PDF]
John R. Ammerman v. Paddy A. Hauden
2005 WI 79 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2003AP2249 COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18610 - 2017-09-21
2005 WI 79 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2003AP2249 COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18610 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, with appropriate references to the record.” An appellate court is improperly burdened where briefs fail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30126 - 2014-09-15
, with appropriate references to the record.” An appellate court is improperly burdened where briefs fail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30126 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 17, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105689 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 17, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105689 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 17, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of A...
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 17, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105689 - 2013-12-16
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 17, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105689 - 2013-12-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentencing discretion. The record discloses no arguable basis for challenging the sentencing court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119180 - 2014-09-15
sentencing discretion. The record discloses no arguable basis for challenging the sentencing court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119180 - 2014-09-15