Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38841 - 38850 of 50524 for our.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Plaintiff’s request.” ¶9 Winzer directs us in part to our supreme court’s decision in Piper. In that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734042 - 2023-11-29

State v. Timothy L. Olson
of Horn will have no effect upon our decision in this case; therefore, we elected not to wait
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14052 - 2005-03-31

State v. Willie S. Gray, Jr.
of trial counsel claim. Our supreme court set forth the relevant standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14056 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
to this testimony constituted deficient performance in light of our conclusion discussed below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31968 - 2008-02-27

[PDF] CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054397 - 2025-12-23

[PDF] CA Blank Order
by Compton. We agree. Our independent review of the record discloses no other potential issues for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912420 - 2025-02-11

State v. Anthony A. Kasparec
. In State v. Ruiz, 118 Wis.2d 177, 194, 347 N.W.2d 352, 360 (1984), our supreme court stressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9299 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
evidence to support a verdict, “we may not substitute our judgment for that of the trier of fact unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91502 - 2013-01-14

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of his postconviction motion for resentencing or sentence modification. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193751 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
of sentencing. We disagree. ¶6 Sentencing is within the discretion of the circuit court, and our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36518 - 2014-09-15