Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38861 - 38870 of 82833 for case search.
Search results 38861 - 38870 of 82833 for case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
had an open case pending in which he was charged with disorderly conduct. The State moved to join
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=746326 - 2024-01-03
had an open case pending in which he was charged with disorderly conduct. The State moved to join
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=746326 - 2024-01-03
State v. Juan B. Garcia
to the State’s failure to comply with a pretrial discovery order. We agree, and reverse and remand the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6313 - 2005-03-31
to the State’s failure to comply with a pretrial discovery order. We agree, and reverse and remand the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6313 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rocky J. Shaw
and the ages of the children.[2] He contends that the privilege could not be deemed waived in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11135 - 2005-03-31
and the ages of the children.[2] He contends that the privilege could not be deemed waived in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11135 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Cynthia J. Hinojosa v. Joe R. Hinojosa
remanded. Before Brown, Nettesheim and Anderson, JJ. PER CURIAM. In court of appeals case No. 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11697 - 2017-09-20
remanded. Before Brown, Nettesheim and Anderson, JJ. PER CURIAM. In court of appeals case No. 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11697 - 2017-09-20
State v. Oto Orlik
, but argues that we should continue to apply the case law that was in effect at the time of his trial. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4195 - 2005-03-31
, but argues that we should continue to apply the case law that was in effect at the time of his trial. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4195 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943969 - 2025-04-22
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943969 - 2025-04-22
Cynthia J. Hinojosa v. Joe R. Hinojosa
and Anderson, JJ. PER CURIAM. In court of appeals case No. 96-2955-FT, Cynthia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11565 - 2005-03-31
and Anderson, JJ. PER CURIAM. In court of appeals case No. 96-2955-FT, Cynthia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11565 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2011AP1030-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2009CF330
motion without a hearing. As we explain below, we believe that existing case law suggests two
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77892 - 2014-09-15
motion without a hearing. As we explain below, we believe that existing case law suggests two
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77892 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Rocky J. Shaw
that the privilege could not be deemed waived in this case because nothing in the record indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11135 - 2017-09-19
that the privilege could not be deemed waived in this case because nothing in the record indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11135 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jawun B.
, the intake specialist at the Children’s Court Center who supervised Jawun’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15774 - 2017-09-21
, the intake specialist at the Children’s Court Center who supervised Jawun’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15774 - 2017-09-21