Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38871 - 38880 of 44730 for part.

COURT OF APPEALS
children. We disagree. We first set forth the most pertinent parts of the circuit court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35529 - 2009-02-11

State v. George A. King
. Defense counsel, however, did not present any second alibi witnesses as part of his offer of proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8173 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
To establish an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, Hackel must satisfy a two-part test. First, she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137823 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
. This occurred after this part No. 2010AP140-CR 8 of the case was concluded.” As the State points
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59313 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey S. Gibson
to a chemical test. This section provides in part: 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2991 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. John V. Asher
to October 1, 2000. 2 Former SCR 21.09(5) provided, in pertinent part: (5) The referee shall, within
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16425 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a mixed question of law and fact. Id., ¶16. We apply a three-part test to determine when a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210301 - 2018-03-28

[PDF] State v. Robert Fowler
. ¶12 The instruction that Fowler belatedly seeks was not part of the standard jury instructions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2337 - 2017-09-19

Pastori M. Balele v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
Balele with respect to the AO5 position. The commission dismissed this part of Balele’s complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14502 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Rule Order
was forthcoming. 13 SCR 70.15 provides in relevant part
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158244 - 2017-09-21