Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38881 - 38890 of 63575 for judgment for ms.
Search results 38881 - 38890 of 63575 for judgment for ms.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Marquise Bailey appeals from a judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=689119 - 2023-08-15
for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Marquise Bailey appeals from a judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=689119 - 2023-08-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we have found no other arguable basis for reversing the judgment of conviction. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110338 - 2017-09-21
of the record, we have found no other arguable basis for reversing the judgment of conviction. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110338 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
an order summarily denying his motion to vacate the judgment of conviction or to withdraw his guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28150 - 2007-02-20
an order summarily denying his motion to vacate the judgment of conviction or to withdraw his guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28150 - 2007-02-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to appeal a judgment convicting him of violating a harassment injunction as a repeater. Blum died without
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114649 - 2017-09-21
to appeal a judgment convicting him of violating a harassment injunction as a repeater. Blum died without
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114649 - 2017-09-21
State v. Carlton B. Campbell
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: MARK A. FRANKEL, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8841 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: MARK A. FRANKEL, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8841 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Luetzow Industries v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
. In a previous judgment in this case, the trial court reversed No. 94-3398 -2- the Commission's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8431 - 2017-09-19
. In a previous judgment in this case, the trial court reversed No. 94-3398 -2- the Commission's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8431 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
of issues. We affirmed the judgment of conviction and the postconviction order. See State v. Edwards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47253 - 2014-09-15
of issues. We affirmed the judgment of conviction and the postconviction order. See State v. Edwards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47253 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
summarily affirm the judgment of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 The State charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026920 - 2025-10-21
summarily affirm the judgment of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 The State charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026920 - 2025-10-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.” Consistent with that pronouncement, the judgment of conviction reflects that Forney was ordered to pay
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162343 - 2017-09-21
.” Consistent with that pronouncement, the judgment of conviction reflects that Forney was ordered to pay
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162343 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Therefore, we summarily affirm the judgment of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. The State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=662652 - 2023-05-31
. Therefore, we summarily affirm the judgment of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. The State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=662652 - 2023-05-31