Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38891 - 38900 of 63937 for records.
Search results 38891 - 38900 of 63937 for records.
COURT OF APPEALS
conduct is supported by evidence in the record regarding Totzke’s statements to the police and the mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46312 - 2010-02-02
conduct is supported by evidence in the record regarding Totzke’s statements to the police and the mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46312 - 2010-02-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1999). We will affirm if the court’s decision was demonstrably based on the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93745 - 2014-09-15
(1999). We will affirm if the court’s decision was demonstrably based on the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93745 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
revving. It wasn’t enough of a description of that on the record to really indicate whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30997 - 2014-09-15
revving. It wasn’t enough of a description of that on the record to really indicate whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30997 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Robert M. Pace v. Circuit Court for Oneida County
proceedings are not part of this record because the Paces did not appeal the board's decision to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13500 - 2017-09-21
proceedings are not part of this record because the Paces did not appeal the board's decision to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13500 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191299 - 2017-09-21
record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191299 - 2017-09-21
State v. Craig A. Zempel
driving record indicated that he had been convicted of OMVWI on two prior occasions within the preceding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14285 - 2005-03-31
driving record indicated that he had been convicted of OMVWI on two prior occasions within the preceding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14285 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appropriate in the past, and continued the schedule with dates into the future. The record supports Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76403 - 2014-09-15
appropriate in the past, and continued the schedule with dates into the future. The record supports Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76403 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2015AP461 3 judgment were not appropriate on this record, we reverse and remand for further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158273 - 2017-09-21
No. 2015AP461 3 judgment were not appropriate on this record, we reverse and remand for further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158273 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Nos. 2013AP2225-CRNM 2013AP2226-CRNM 2 reviewing the Records and the no-merit report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109481 - 2017-09-21
Nos. 2013AP2225-CRNM 2013AP2226-CRNM 2 reviewing the Records and the no-merit report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109481 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
to any other sentence” (emphasis added). ¶5 On January 4, 2007, the Offender Records Supervisor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34300 - 2014-09-15
to any other sentence” (emphasis added). ¶5 On January 4, 2007, the Offender Records Supervisor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34300 - 2014-09-15