Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38891 - 38900 of 46960 for show's.

[PDF] State v. Zan Morgan
(1983) (plurality opinion) (“[A] show of official authority such that ‘a reasonable person would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4281 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] John P. Morris v. Employe Trust Funds Board
, Morris submitted an affidavit to the board purporting to show that he qualified for an additional 1.5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7823 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
enforcement, the State bears the burden of showing by a preponderance of the evidence that the statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=891296 - 2024-12-17

[PDF] Leslie J. Schatz v. Gary R. McCaughtry
, the petition failed to allege any specific facts showing retaliation. It also determined that there were
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16489 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Duane S. Jorgensen v. James Barber
for the years 1996 through 2001. Karnitz testified that exhibit 105 showed that the Jorgensens paid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6590 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Artha Majorowicz v. Allied Mutual Insurance Company
, a plaintiff must show the absence of a reasonable basis for denying benefits of the policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11621 - 2017-09-19

State v. William Nielsen
Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697. To prove deficient performance, a defendant must show specific acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3325 - 2005-03-31

WI App 125 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP658 Complete Title of...
” because “evidence showing that the person’s mental disorder predisposes such individual to engage in acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70097 - 2011-09-27

State v. Justin D. Gudgeon
discovered evidence contains five elements.[4] In order to satisfy this test, the moving party must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25462 - 2006-07-25

[PDF] Robert A. Benkoski v. Mark A. Flood
) the proper burden of proof, (2) whether the evidence showed an agreement between Benkoski and the Longsines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2585 - 2017-09-19