Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3891 - 3900 of 95313 for Shawano County Case Search.
Search results 3891 - 3900 of 95313 for Shawano County Case Search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. This is not a case where there is a “total absence of any statement under oath to support a search warrant.” Tye
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708038 - 2023-09-27
. This is not a case where there is a “total absence of any statement under oath to support a search warrant.” Tye
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708038 - 2023-09-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. This is not a case where there is a “total absence of any statement under oath to support a search warrant.” Tye
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708038 - 2023-09-27
. This is not a case where there is a “total absence of any statement under oath to support a search warrant.” Tye
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708038 - 2023-09-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Eau Claire County: WILLIAM M. GABLER, SR., Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71767 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court for Eau Claire County: WILLIAM M. GABLER, SR., Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71767 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for Eau Claire County: WILLIAM M. GABLER, SR., Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71767 - 2011-10-03
for Eau Claire County: WILLIAM M. GABLER, SR., Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71767 - 2011-10-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on appeal treat this case as a stop-and-frisk case, and therefore, subject to the limitations to search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185479 - 2017-09-21
on appeal treat this case as a stop-and-frisk case, and therefore, subject to the limitations to search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185479 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for Waukesha County: Linda M. van de water, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 NEUBAUER, P.J.[1] Jon Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72163 - 2011-10-11
for Waukesha County: Linda M. van de water, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 NEUBAUER, P.J.[1] Jon Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72163 - 2011-10-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of these cases, the purpose of the initial traffic stop had concluded prior to the challenged search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72163 - 2014-09-15
of these cases, the purpose of the initial traffic stop had concluded prior to the challenged search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72163 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
Wayne R. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 3.2(d), at 58–59 & nn.134–35 (4th ed. 2004) (collecting cases
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250171 - 2019-11-15
Wayne R. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 3.2(d), at 58–59 & nn.134–35 (4th ed. 2004) (collecting cases
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250171 - 2019-11-15
[PDF]
WI APP 25
the search in that case lawful and not suppressed the drug evidence if the pouch had been large enough
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239468 - 2019-08-13
the search in that case lawful and not suppressed the drug evidence if the pouch had been large enough
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239468 - 2019-08-13
[PDF]
WI APP 72
explained that the county “did not search its own devices to access the information in Bower’s [a]ccount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=866560 - 2025-02-04
explained that the county “did not search its own devices to access the information in Bower’s [a]ccount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=866560 - 2025-02-04