Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3891 - 3900 of 6659 for mix.

COURT OF APPEALS
purpose involves a mixed question of fact and law. See Brunson v. Ward, 2001 WI 89, ¶27, 245 Wis. 2d 163
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48076 - 2010-03-23

Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
is to give effect to the legislature's intent. See Riverwood Park, Inc. v. Central Ready-Mixed Concrete, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10173 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
facts to entitle the defendant to a hearing for the relief requested is a mixed standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33867 - 2008-08-27

State v. Jonothan Gils
of counsel is a mixed question of law and fact. Johnson, 133 Wis. 2d at 216, 395 N.W.2d at 181. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2170 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
convictions were for “domestic abuse” within the meaning of Wis. Stat. § 968.075(1)(a) presents a mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125279 - 2014-10-28

State v. Yolanda L.
present mixed questions of fact and law. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 633-34, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5811 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Debra Jungwirth v. Jefferson F. Ray, M.D.
--are mixed questions of fact and law. Peplinski, No. 93-0568, slip op. at 9. We thus employ a two-step
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8014 - 2017-09-19

State v. Sherman B. Rones
insisted on going to trial.” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). This claim presents a mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2988 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel presents a mixed question of law and fact.” State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546984 - 2022-07-26

COURT OF APPEALS
a parent proves ineffective assistance of counsel is a mixed question of fact and law. See State v. Pitsch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144662 - 2015-07-21