Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3891 - 3900 of 63187 for records.
Search results 3891 - 3900 of 63187 for records.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95627 - 2014-09-15
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95627 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record, the no-merit report, and the response as mandated by Anders. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682395 - 2023-07-26
the record, the no-merit report, and the response as mandated by Anders. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682395 - 2023-07-26
CA Blank Order
independently reviewed the Record. We conclude that there are no arguably meritorious issues for appeal, and we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95629 - 2013-04-15
independently reviewed the Record. We conclude that there are no arguably meritorious issues for appeal, and we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95629 - 2013-04-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to obtain one. We agree that the record does not reflect that Chileski voluntarily waived his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36434 - 2005-03-31
to obtain one. We agree that the record does not reflect that Chileski voluntarily waived his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36434 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Director’s Address
electronically. The court record is kept electronically. And much of our communication is done through e-mail
/publications/speeches/docs/directorsaddress22.pdf - 2022-11-02
electronically. The court record is kept electronically. And much of our communication is done through e-mail
/publications/speeches/docs/directorsaddress22.pdf - 2022-11-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Addendum in the record is unsigned and dated February 28, 2022. At trial when presented with the Smoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016593 - 2025-09-30
Addendum in the record is unsigned and dated February 28, 2022. At trial when presented with the Smoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016593 - 2025-09-30
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
report. We have reviewed the Record in light of counsel’s reports and Willis’s responses. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913151 - 2025-02-12
report. We have reviewed the Record in light of counsel’s reports and Willis’s responses. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913151 - 2025-02-12
[PDF]
State v. Scott L. Snow
or unjustified basis for the sentence in the record. Id. at 622-23. ¶6 The primary factors the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5261 - 2017-09-19
or unjustified basis for the sentence in the record. Id. at 622-23. ¶6 The primary factors the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5261 - 2017-09-19
State v. Scott L. Snow
unreasonable or unjustified basis for the sentence in the record. Id. at 622-23. ¶6 The primary factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5261 - 2005-03-31
unreasonable or unjustified basis for the sentence in the record. Id. at 622-23. ¶6 The primary factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5261 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brian C. Wegner
on the record that it considered Wegner’s positive adjustments while on probation. ¶7 The record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16239 - 2005-03-31
on the record that it considered Wegner’s positive adjustments while on probation. ¶7 The record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16239 - 2005-03-31