Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3891 - 3900 of 20304 for sai.
Search results 3891 - 3900 of 20304 for sai.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
saying yes to everything and in response to your questions. But I believe based on the in-depth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104034 - 2017-09-21
saying yes to everything and in response to your questions. But I believe based on the in-depth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104034 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
saying that he had taken “one hit” on the pipe at 2:00. ¶32 The deputy said, “Based on what we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280749 - 2020-08-20
saying that he had taken “one hit” on the pipe at 2:00. ¶32 The deputy said, “Based on what we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280749 - 2020-08-20
[PDF]
State v. Marquis D. Hudson
:] What did he say then? [POST:] He said, I should apologize to him. He wouldn’t recognize him during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20510 - 2017-09-21
:] What did he say then? [POST:] He said, I should apologize to him. He wouldn’t recognize him during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20510 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Willie Cooper
. She said she had had a couple beers that evening, but did not say there was drug use. ¶6 About
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25111 - 2017-09-21
. She said she had had a couple beers that evening, but did not say there was drug use. ¶6 About
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25111 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Heather R. Nugent v. Charles A. Slaght
(1971). American Family does not, however, attempt to reconcile this language with case law saying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2638 - 2017-09-19
(1971). American Family does not, however, attempt to reconcile this language with case law saying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2638 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
relationship with Bigger, asking, “[I]s it fair to say it was basically over by the time you moved out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042989 - 2025-11-25
relationship with Bigger, asking, “[I]s it fair to say it was basically over by the time you moved out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042989 - 2025-11-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, I say, whenever you need it, just spend it and use it. Just let me know, that’s all. I’m not—I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102168 - 2017-09-21
, I say, whenever you need it, just spend it and use it. Just let me know, that’s all. I’m not—I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102168 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the jury, this juror: didn’t seem to be following what you were saying and she was laughing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138606 - 2017-09-21
to the jury, this juror: didn’t seem to be following what you were saying and she was laughing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138606 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, which they believed to be black men. They heard one male voice say, “[W]e really fucked up this time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28568 - 2014-09-15
, which they believed to be black men. They heard one male voice say, “[W]e really fucked up this time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28568 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Melonnie Rae Sundberg v. John Mark Sundberg
into evidence without objection, without formally saying “received.” We reject this proposition. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3656 - 2017-09-19
into evidence without objection, without formally saying “received.” We reject this proposition. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3656 - 2017-09-19