Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38901 - 38910 of 98406 for court records search online.
Search results 38901 - 38910 of 98406 for court records search online.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The record also discloses no basis for challenging the court’s sentencing discretion. The court considered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160130 - 2017-09-21
. The record also discloses no basis for challenging the court’s sentencing discretion. The court considered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160130 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
District IV March 25, 2015 To: Hon. Mark L. Goodman Circuit Court Judge, Branch II Monroe County
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138475 - 2015-03-24
District IV March 25, 2015 To: Hon. Mark L. Goodman Circuit Court Judge, Branch II Monroe County
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138475 - 2015-03-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878081 - 2024-11-19
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878081 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court needed to make a record on the issue. It should be noted that Schneider’s conviction for OWI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139093 - 2017-09-21
court needed to make a record on the issue. It should be noted that Schneider’s conviction for OWI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139093 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878081 - 2024-11-19
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878081 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response, but he did not do so. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728217 - 2023-11-14
a response, but he did not do so. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728217 - 2023-11-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Because this court’s independent review of the record confirms that counsel correctly analyzed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069739 - 2026-01-27
. Because this court’s independent review of the record confirms that counsel correctly analyzed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069739 - 2026-01-27
[PDF]
State v. Patrick C. Webster
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE July 30, 1998 This opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13370 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE July 30, 1998 This opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13370 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of Jeremy’s trial counsel. Upon reviewing the records, this court agrees with counsel’s description
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=598319 - 2022-12-06
of Jeremy’s trial counsel. Upon reviewing the records, this court agrees with counsel’s description
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=598319 - 2022-12-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
OFFICE OF THE CLERK WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS 110 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 215 P.O
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416655 - 2021-09-01
OFFICE OF THE CLERK WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS 110 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 215 P.O
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416655 - 2021-09-01