Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38901 - 38910 of 58506 for speedy trial.

State v. Lawrence M. Ventrice
to warrant a jury instruction on coercion, he should have been permitted to assert that defense at trial. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4042 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment granting an injunction and litigation costs after a bench trial. The circuit court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78727 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Jeanette Ocasio v. Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital
malpractice action. Ocasio argues that the trial court erred in its ruling dismissing her action because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3249 - 2017-09-19

Village of Hobart v. Brown County
judgment granted in favor of Brown County and the Brown County Solid Waste Management Board. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6685 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Douglas County Child Support Department v. Hossain K.
by appropriate record reference that he brought this objection to the attention of the trial court. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18190 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
petitions and preserved her right to a jury trial. The court scheduled a settlement conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821399 - 2024-07-02

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Russell Goldstein
in a divorce proceeding. The case proceeded to trial in the Milwaukee County Circuit Court, and the trial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16729 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
an injunction and litigation costs after a bench trial. The circuit court concluded Hansen violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78727 - 2012-03-13

Michael T. Mulqueen v. Barbara Geller
). This extrinsic evidence may include any “statements of counsel made in the presence of the trial judge,” D'Angelo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3812 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Kraemer Brothers, Inc. v. Dane County
. The trial court determined that the privacy interests of Kraemer Brothers’ employees justified redacting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14692 - 2017-09-21