Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38911 - 38920 of 83787 for simple case search.
Search results 38911 - 38920 of 83787 for simple case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
previously identified as one of the stolen items and a cigarette case. The ring and cigarette case were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101061 - 2017-09-21
previously identified as one of the stolen items and a cigarette case. The ring and cigarette case were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101061 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
case law. See State v. Gilbert, 115 Wis. 2d 371, 375-76, 380, 340 N.W.2d 511 (1983) (holding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=328062 - 2021-01-27
case law. See State v. Gilbert, 115 Wis. 2d 371, 375-76, 380, 340 N.W.2d 511 (1983) (holding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=328062 - 2021-01-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the Plasters agreed to arbitrate. ¶3 EFWR appealed, and we remanded the case to the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=874999 - 2024-11-12
that the Plasters agreed to arbitrate. ¶3 EFWR appealed, and we remanded the case to the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=874999 - 2024-11-12
COURT OF APPEALS
exercised its discretion by reopening the case for additional evidence and that the officer unlawfully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118930 - 2014-08-04
exercised its discretion by reopening the case for additional evidence and that the officer unlawfully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118930 - 2014-08-04
Patricia M. Ihlenfeldt v. Michael L. Ihlenfeldt
affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8650 - 2005-03-31
affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8650 - 2005-03-31
Lloyd M. Morey Trust v. Robert Morey
been to allow parties to bring relevant cases which are decided after the briefs have been submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15590 - 2005-03-31
been to allow parties to bring relevant cases which are decided after the briefs have been submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15590 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the victims in this case (“Sam,” “Keith,” and “Ronald”). No. 2022AP337 3 denied Brim’s plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682443 - 2023-07-26
to the victims in this case (“Sam,” “Keith,” and “Ronald”). No. 2022AP337 3 denied Brim’s plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682443 - 2023-07-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
The no-merit report sets forth the procedural history of the case and addresses the validity of Dobbins’ plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955204 - 2025-05-13
The no-merit report sets forth the procedural history of the case and addresses the validity of Dobbins’ plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955204 - 2025-05-13
COURT OF APPEALS
rights were terminated. ¶3 A jury trial was held on February 1-2, 2007. The case was tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31277 - 2008-02-27
rights were terminated. ¶3 A jury trial was held on February 1-2, 2007. The case was tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31277 - 2008-02-27
Janet Kielas v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
that in applying the clear language of the policy to the facts in this case, the trial court reached the right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7431 - 2005-03-31
that in applying the clear language of the policy to the facts in this case, the trial court reached the right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7431 - 2005-03-31