Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38921 - 38930 of 77051 for judgment for u s.

COURT OF APPEALS
… [was that Bergemann] is not meeting the statutory requirement[s for supervised release] … right before we took a break
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100807 - 2013-08-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
” and “sought to change [Oliver]’s property use[.]” It contends that Acevedo does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1060581 - 2026-01-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
]t’s part of the record, it’s part of the judgment.” We discern no error in the court’s exclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114810 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Steven J. Bierce v. Shorewest Realtors, Inc.
… as if zoned residential and as actually zoned, business-commercial” “adopt[s] the rule of damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21362 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] William Keen v. Dane County Board of Supervisors
will and not its judgment; and (4) whether the evidence was such that it might reasonably make the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6284 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was currently impairing Treadway’s “understanding and judgment regarding the mental illness itself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156301 - 2017-09-21

William Keen v. Dane County Board of Supervisors
or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) whether the evidence was such that it might
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6284 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Roosevelt Bennett, Jr.
(Ct. App. 1988). The appellate court may substitute its judgment for that of the trier of fact only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4080 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
of the record, it’s part of the judgment.” We discern no error in the court’s exclusion of Jayne’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114810 - 2014-06-16

2007 WI APP 224
on the question of legislative intent. The statute criminalizes “3 or more violations under s. 948.02(1) or (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30317 - 2007-10-30