Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38931 - 38940 of 57351 for id.

COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. at 321. The surviving spouse sold some of the land by quitclaim deed to another. Id. at 322
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97795 - 2013-06-05

[PDF] Col D'var Graphics, Inc. v. Forrester Enterprises, Inc.
the insurer, strict construction does not permit strained construction. Id. at 264, 371 N.W.2d at 394
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8275 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
novo. Id. ¶16 If, on the other hand, the postconviction motion “does not raise facts sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258342 - 2020-04-21

Mary Ellen Kuesel v. Firstar Trust Company
. 1989). What the trustee did or did not do is a question of fact. Id. What a reasonable trustee would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4732 - 2005-03-31

David R. Umhoefer v. Police and Fire Commission of the City of Mequon
of evidence, id. at 125, and Wis. Stat. § 905.05(1) states that the privilege belongs to the person against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4737 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
be disbelieved or discounted.’” Id. (citation omitted). ¶21 We begin by observing that the Van Stelles have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57071 - 2014-09-15

2006 WI APP 202
of a manifest injustice. Id. With respect to an Alford plea, “the factual basis requirement is only satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26455 - 2006-10-30

[PDF] George M. Reynolds v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
to [an agency's] application of a particular statute to a particular set of facts. Id. at 544-45, 499 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9466 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] The Landings LLC v. The City of Waupaca
.2d 506 (1997) (citation omitted). To do so, we first consider the language of the statute. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19123 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Shauna L. Conroy v. Marquette University
control, were too remote. See id. at 428, 541 N.W.2d at 751. The supreme court stated, “[W]e conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11265 - 2017-09-19