Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38941 - 38950 of 46138 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 38941 - 38950 of 46138 for paternity test paper work.
State v. April O.
, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). Because both elements of the test must be satisfied, we may dispose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15303 - 2005-03-31
, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). Because both elements of the test must be satisfied, we may dispose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15303 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and clear preponderance of the evidence.” Id. at 249-50. Singler’s arguments do not meet this test. In any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85394 - 2012-07-25
and clear preponderance of the evidence.” Id. at 249-50. Singler’s arguments do not meet this test. In any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85394 - 2012-07-25
State v. John Doe
-part test to determine whether the defendant is deserving of a sentencing reduction in light of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7396 - 2005-05-09
-part test to determine whether the defendant is deserving of a sentencing reduction in light of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7396 - 2005-05-09
COURT OF APPEALS
… [the] judgment to that actually pronounced.” Id. at 37. The test is whether nunc pro tunc entry “will make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92106 - 2013-01-28
… [the] judgment to that actually pronounced.” Id. at 37. The test is whether nunc pro tunc entry “will make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92106 - 2013-01-28
[PDF]
State v. Chris Lamar Crittendon
of the proceeding was unreliable. Id. at 687. ¶10 Both prongs of the Strickland test involve mixed questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7228 - 2017-09-20
of the proceeding was unreliable. Id. at 687. ¶10 Both prongs of the Strickland test involve mixed questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7228 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Honeycrest Farms, Inc. v. Brave Harvestore Systems, Inc.
the statute of limitations defense. We are not persuaded. The test of whether a party should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10628 - 2017-09-20
the statute of limitations defense. We are not persuaded. The test of whether a party should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10628 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
constituted plain error, the test we apply is whether, in the context of the entire record of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051064 - 2025-12-17
constituted plain error, the test we apply is whether, in the context of the entire record of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051064 - 2025-12-17
State v. Antoine Murphy
the jury to conclude that he intended to kill the victim. ¶4 The test on appeal for the sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2595 - 2005-03-31
the jury to conclude that he intended to kill the victim. ¶4 The test on appeal for the sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2595 - 2005-03-31
Cheryl Ellerman v. City of Manitowoc
the lot was “held out to the public,” the supreme court stated that the test was whether the person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6134 - 2005-03-31
the lot was “held out to the public,” the supreme court stated that the test was whether the person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6134 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by substantial evidence in the record. Hedlund, 337 Wis. 2d 634, ¶21. “This test means that taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96858 - 2014-09-15
by substantial evidence in the record. Hedlund, 337 Wis. 2d 634, ¶21. “This test means that taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96858 - 2014-09-15