Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38971 - 38980 of 77065 for judgment for u s.
Search results 38971 - 38980 of 77065 for judgment for u s.
[PDF]
State v. Jamie L. Pennington
, V. JAMIE L. PENNINGTON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5782 - 2017-09-19
, V. JAMIE L. PENNINGTON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5782 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Brown County: WILLIAM M. ATKINSON and TIMOTHY A. HINKFUSS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=651721 - 2023-05-02
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Brown County: WILLIAM M. ATKINSON and TIMOTHY A. HINKFUSS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=651721 - 2023-05-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
. FLYNN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36591 - 2014-09-15
. FLYNN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36591 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. GRIMES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27592 - 2014-09-15
. GRIMES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27592 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, V. MATTHEW ALLEN LILEK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104034 - 2017-09-21
, V. MATTHEW ALLEN LILEK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104034 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is timely from a final judgment or order, both present questions of law that we review de novo.” Sanders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627795 - 2023-02-28
is timely from a final judgment or order, both present questions of law that we review de novo.” Sanders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627795 - 2023-02-28
Lorentz R. Roe v. Timothy Roe
, Defendants. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Waupaca County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15500 - 2005-03-31
, Defendants. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Waupaca County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15500 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lorentz R. Roe v. Timothy Roe
APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Waupaca County: PHILIP M. KIRK, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15500 - 2017-09-21
APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Waupaca County: PHILIP M. KIRK, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15500 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Eau Claire County: EMILY M. LONG, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763335 - 2024-02-13
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Eau Claire County: EMILY M. LONG, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763335 - 2024-02-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Marathon County: JILL N. FALLSTAD, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237036 - 2019-03-12
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Marathon County: JILL N. FALLSTAD, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237036 - 2019-03-12