Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38971 - 38980 of 82603 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
Search results 38971 - 38980 of 82603 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
State v. Paulo C. Gonzalez
to that level would create a totally subjective test. The trial court appropriately allowed Gonzalez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6280 - 2005-03-31
to that level would create a totally subjective test. The trial court appropriately allowed Gonzalez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6280 - 2005-03-31
State v. Esther M. Phillips-Crouch
reasonable suspicion is a common sense test: under all the facts and circumstances present, what would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19195 - 2005-08-01
reasonable suspicion is a common sense test: under all the facts and circumstances present, what would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19195 - 2005-08-01
COURT OF APPEALS
U.S. 1, 21 (1968)). The test is an objective one: “[W]hether a reasonably prudent [officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34399 - 2008-10-27
U.S. 1, 21 (1968)). The test is an objective one: “[W]hether a reasonably prudent [officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34399 - 2008-10-27
Brown County Department of Health & Social Services v. Samantha E.
proceedings. In re M.D., 168 Wis.2d 995, 1002, 485 N.W.2d 52, 54 (1992). Wisconsin uses a two-prong test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12180 - 2005-03-31
proceedings. In re M.D., 168 Wis.2d 995, 1002, 485 N.W.2d 52, 54 (1992). Wisconsin uses a two-prong test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12180 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Donald J. Minniecheske
to incite or produce such action." Later, the Supreme Court again emphasized that the test for whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12324 - 2017-09-21
to incite or produce such action." Later, the Supreme Court again emphasized that the test for whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12324 - 2017-09-21
State v. Willie E. Willis
that was necessary to the defense of the defendant, and that's what the test is; not whether it might be nice to know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10279 - 2005-03-31
that was necessary to the defense of the defendant, and that's what the test is; not whether it might be nice to know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10279 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kathleen Wagner
of an intoxicant, second offense. The blood test conducted after her arrest yielded a blood alcohol concentration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14868 - 2005-03-31
of an intoxicant, second offense. The blood test conducted after her arrest yielded a blood alcohol concentration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14868 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Multi-State Specialized Transit, Inc. v. McCain Food Services, Inc.
-0927 4 the approval of the DNR, failed to conduct testing of the onion waste and failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3805 - 2017-09-20
-0927 4 the approval of the DNR, failed to conduct testing of the onion waste and failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3805 - 2017-09-20
State v. Alberta P. Lessard
danger, that is not the test. Douglas D. at ¶34 (“It is not necessary that the speaker have the ability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3062 - 2005-03-31
danger, that is not the test. Douglas D. at ¶34 (“It is not necessary that the speaker have the ability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3062 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
(quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21 (1968)). The test is an objective one: “[W]hether a reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34399 - 2014-09-15
(quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21 (1968)). The test is an objective one: “[W]hether a reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34399 - 2014-09-15