Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38981 - 38990 of 83177 for case code.
Search results 38981 - 38990 of 83177 for case code.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801768 - 2024-05-21
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801768 - 2024-05-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
DNA testing conducted as part of the investigation of the case. She stated that there was a “two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878592 - 2024-11-20
DNA testing conducted as part of the investigation of the case. She stated that there was a “two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878592 - 2024-11-20
[PDF]
Matthew Kulbiski v. Michael DeMarco
any impact on the case. We affirm the judgment. ¶2 The following facts are undisputed. A vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5386 - 2017-09-19
any impact on the case. We affirm the judgment. ¶2 The following facts are undisputed. A vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5386 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
had been sent to him on February 11, 2011. Evans ultimately agreed to resolve the case with a plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95943 - 2013-04-22
had been sent to him on February 11, 2011. Evans ultimately agreed to resolve the case with a plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95943 - 2013-04-22
[PDF]
State v. Robert Vargas
did not make such an admission in this case because he did not do it. On cross-examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8463 - 2017-09-19
did not make such an admission in this case because he did not do it. On cross-examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8463 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or mere surplusage.’” See id. (citation omitted). ¶6 The parties agree that this case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250211 - 2019-11-19
or mere surplusage.’” See id. (citation omitted). ¶6 The parties agree that this case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250211 - 2019-11-19
COURT OF APPEALS
for disorderly conduct and attempted battery, both of which were misdemeanors. ¶4 The case ultimately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144865 - 2015-07-20
for disorderly conduct and attempted battery, both of which were misdemeanors. ¶4 The case ultimately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144865 - 2015-07-20
COURT OF APPEALS
summary judgment and dismissed it from the case. ¶7 The Saladins appeal from the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97605 - 2013-06-03
summary judgment and dismissed it from the case. ¶7 The Saladins appeal from the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97605 - 2013-06-03
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1085680 - 2026-03-04
review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1085680 - 2026-03-04
[PDF]
Michael Hook v. William A. Bonner and Judith L. Bonner
with the statement of the case. Although WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(1)(d) (2001-02) provides that the statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5538 - 2017-09-19
with the statement of the case. Although WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(1)(d) (2001-02) provides that the statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5538 - 2017-09-19