Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38981 - 38990 of 63530 for records/1000.

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Tara P.
legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record.’” Lievrouw v. Roth, 157 Wis. 2d 332
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4587 - 2017-09-19

John A. Seitz v. Waukesha County
of the appropriate factors, the record establishes that the Commission was apprised of the circumstances and gave all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9550 - 2005-03-31

State v. Minko Lewis
was known by the officers to be less than fully reliable.” As the State responds, however, “the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4021 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
to understand even though specific explanation not shown on record). (Record and statutory citations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109016 - 2014-03-17

[PDF] Ray A. Peterson v. Teresa E. Tucker
, and the record suggests that Peterson was unsuccessful in appeals of these administrative determinations.8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4125 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Stanley Egerson
a concealed weapon. The record does not indicate that either Redmond or Egerson was involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12695 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Franklin M.O. v. Sara Lee J.
for the accountant using Franklin’s business records. The guardian argued below that the court should impute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11439 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
factual findings are supported by the record. Specifically, the circuit court’s factual findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140979 - 2015-04-29

State v. John F. Braz
that just keeps dragging out.” ¶15 Given this record, we harbor no lack of confidence in the outcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2689 - 2005-03-31

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Tara P.
standards and in accordance with the facts of record.’” Lievrouw v. Roth, 157 Wis. 2d 332, 348, 459 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4588 - 2005-03-31