Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38991 - 39000 of 69131 for he.
Search results 38991 - 39000 of 69131 for he.
Iola Vision v. Paul Vermeern
provided his minor children by Iola Vision Center. He contends that his former wife, Dawn Melum, did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10780 - 2005-03-31
provided his minor children by Iola Vision Center. He contends that his former wife, Dawn Melum, did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10780 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
the damages he alleged in his counterclaim. On appeal, Watters argues the circuit court erred by finding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115636 - 2014-06-30
the damages he alleged in his counterclaim. On appeal, Watters argues the circuit court erred by finding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115636 - 2014-06-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
children to harmful material. He argues the State presented insufficient evidence to establish that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42449 - 2014-09-15
children to harmful material. He argues the State presented insufficient evidence to establish that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42449 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James E. Jones
on probation. After his probation was revoked he was resentenced to twenty months in the Wisconsin State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11206 - 2017-09-19
on probation. After his probation was revoked he was resentenced to twenty months in the Wisconsin State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11206 - 2017-09-19
State v. Daniel J. Frank
LUNDSTEN, J.[1] Daniel J. Frank appeals from a judgment of conviction. He complained in his appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16243 - 2005-03-31
LUNDSTEN, J.[1] Daniel J. Frank appeals from a judgment of conviction. He complained in his appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16243 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael D. Lawrence
him on three counts of sexual assault of a child and one count of false imprisonment. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16260 - 2017-09-21
him on three counts of sexual assault of a child and one count of false imprisonment. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16260 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argument. Generally speaking, Ganta appears to complain that he did not receive a fair trial because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75596 - 2014-09-15
argument. Generally speaking, Ganta appears to complain that he did not receive a fair trial because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75596 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael D. Lawrence
count of false imprisonment. He contends that the sexual assault charges were multiplicitous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16260 - 2005-03-31
count of false imprisonment. He contends that the sexual assault charges were multiplicitous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16260 - 2005-03-31
State v. Randy L. Barreau
LUNDSTEN, J.[1] Randy L. Barreau appeals from a judgment of conviction. He complained in his appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16242 - 2005-03-31
LUNDSTEN, J.[1] Randy L. Barreau appeals from a judgment of conviction. He complained in his appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16242 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
533 (1988). Guldan concedes that, under the consecutive-sentence rule set forth in Boettcher, he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165495 - 2017-09-21
533 (1988). Guldan concedes that, under the consecutive-sentence rule set forth in Boettcher, he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165495 - 2017-09-21