Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 391 - 400 of 4373 for bd.

[PDF] March 2006 Table of Unpublished Opinions
Polster 1 02-23-2006 Affirmed 2004AP003383 The Kraemer Co. v. Pierce County Bd. of Adjustment 1 02-07
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24737 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Clyde Sukanen v. School District of Monroe
to de novo review. See Neis v. Bd. of Educ., 128 Wis. 2d 309, 314, 381 N.W.2d 614 (Ct. App. 1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4415 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the board of appeals, not the decision of the circuit court. See Hillis v. Village of Fox Point Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96851 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
); Ledger v. Waupaca Bd. of Appeals, 146 Wis. 2d 256, 266, 430 N.W.2d 370 (Ct. App. 1988). The Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728997 - 2023-11-14

[PDF] Frontsheet
. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of Wis. Sys., 103 Wis. 2d 358, 360-61, 309 N.W.2d 3 (Ct. App. 1981
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168034 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] February 2010 Published Orders
of Jackson 2009AP000209 2010 WI App 25 Evelyn Propp v. Sauk Co. Bd. of Adjustment 2009AP000516 CR 2010 WI App
/ca/pub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47431 - 2014-09-15

Rules Hearing
a committee to review the opinion in Case No. 02-0057-OA, Jensen v. Wisconsin Elections Bd., 2002 WI 13, 249
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35414 - 2009-03-22

[PDF] Frontsheet
500. 7 See, e.g., Lamar Cent. Outdoor, Inc. v. Bd. of Zoning Appeals of City of Milwaukee, 2005
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191081 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Chris Gentilli v. Board of the Police and Fire Commissioners of the City of Madison
it shall be final and conclusive (emphasis added). See also Clancy v. Bd. of Fire & Police Comm'rs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16695 - 2017-09-21

State v. Kenosha County Board of Adjustment
, our standard of review of the circuit court's ruling is de novo. See Nielsen v. Waukesha County Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10761 - 2005-03-31