Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 391 - 400 of 26439 for marital settlement agreement/1000.

Nancy M. Bedora v. David L. Bedora
court erroneously (1) included his shop, land and buildings in the marital estate; (2) included business
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12879 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Daniel K. T., Jr. v. Sara K. L.
is that the parties entered into a valid and binding settlement agreement to amend the trust. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13873 - 2014-09-15

Daniel K. T., Jr. v. Sara K. L.
settlement agreement to amend the trust entered into at the September 10 hearing. Daniel, Jr., appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13873 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. The parties entered into a partial marital settlement agreement in which they agreed to joint legal custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159649 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with their Marital Settlement Agreement (MSA). The circuit court’s finding of willful nonpayment was based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=635855 - 2023-03-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. The parties entered into a marital settlement agreement, and a judgment of legal separation was granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218468 - 2018-08-30

[PDF] James W. Jeffords v. Pamela Scott (Jeffords)
28, 1997. As part of the divorce, they entered into a marital settlement agreement (MSA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2307 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] David J. Dowiasch v. Tracy L. Dowiasch
share of the marital estate. Tracy raises a number of issues. She No. 99-0179 2 first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15026 - 2017-09-21

David J. Dowiasch v. Tracy L. Dowiasch
share of the marital estate. Tracy raises a number of issues. She first argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15026 - 2005-03-31

Aspen Services Inc. v. IT Corporation
agreement Aspen was not entitled to any award of attorney’s fees and costs. We affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12284 - 2005-03-31