Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 391 - 400 of 58337 for speedy trial.
Search results 391 - 400 of 58337 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey J. Rittenhouse
to have his convictions dismissed based upon the denial of a speedy trial. In the alternative, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3385 - 2017-09-19
to have his convictions dismissed based upon the denial of a speedy trial. In the alternative, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3385 - 2017-09-19
State v. Bernard E. Burgess
bias against him by criticizing his invocation of his speedy trial rights; and (5) improperly rejected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3279 - 2005-03-31
bias against him by criticizing his invocation of his speedy trial rights; and (5) improperly rejected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3279 - 2005-03-31
Michael J. Hager v. Gary Marten
that the only due process claim Hager may have is a right to a speedy trial. The right to a speedy trial has
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17341 - 2005-03-31
that the only due process claim Hager may have is a right to a speedy trial. The right to a speedy trial has
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17341 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
provided ineffective assistance by failing to raise claims including judicial bias and a speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204468 - 2017-12-06
provided ineffective assistance by failing to raise claims including judicial bias and a speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204468 - 2017-12-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Thomas first argues that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial. Thomas does
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159831 - 2017-09-21
. Thomas first argues that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial. Thomas does
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159831 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Bernard E. Burgess
his invocation of his speedy trial rights; and (5) improperly rejected his request for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3279 - 2017-09-19
his invocation of his speedy trial rights; and (5) improperly rejected his request for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3279 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
for a speedy trial; (2) put on a reasonable defense under the circumstances where the jury was aware
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29347 - 2007-06-11
for a speedy trial; (2) put on a reasonable defense under the circumstances where the jury was aware
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29347 - 2007-06-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
for counsel’s failure to: (1) file a motion for a speedy trial; (2) put on a reasonable defense under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29347 - 2014-09-15
for counsel’s failure to: (1) file a motion for a speedy trial; (2) put on a reasonable defense under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29347 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was ineffective for failing to seek an adjournment of the trial because Green’s speedy trial demand
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=696657 - 2023-08-29
was ineffective for failing to seek an adjournment of the trial because Green’s speedy trial demand
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=696657 - 2023-08-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was ineffective for failing to seek an adjournment of the trial because Green’s speedy trial demand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=696657 - 2023-08-29
was ineffective for failing to seek an adjournment of the trial because Green’s speedy trial demand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=696657 - 2023-08-29