Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 391 - 400 of 734 for von.

[PDF] Zignego Company, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
on the briefs of Charles P. Magyera of von Briesen, Purtell & Roper, S.C. of Milwaukee and John P. Miller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11087 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Gary Tate v. David H. Schwarz
was such that the agency might reasonably make the order or determination in question. Von Arx v. Schwarz, 185 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2709 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 132
would be where the insured is the bailee or trustee of property. See Vons Cos., Inc. v. Federal Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33434 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a determination, we must affirm, “even though the evidence may support a contrary determination.” Von Arx v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=420699 - 2021-09-02

[PDF] David R. Umhoefer v. Police and Fire Commission of the City of Mequon
A. Koch of von Briesen & Roper, S.C. of Milwaukee. 2002 WI App 217 NOTICE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4737 - 2017-09-19

2010 WI APP 14
. Riordan and Douglas M. Raines of von Briesen & Roper, S.C., Milwaukee. Respondent ATTORNEYS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44822 - 2010-01-26

[PDF] State v. Steenberg Homes, Inc.
and Timothy W. Feeley of von Briesen, Purtell & Roper, S.C. of Milwaukee. Respondent ATTORNEYS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13518 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Motive Equipment, Inc.
was submitted on the brief of Christopher P. Riordan and Maureen Hegarty Kanter of von Briesen & Roper, s.c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21734 - 2017-09-21

State v. Steenberg Homes, Inc.
was submitted on the briefs of James C. Reiher and Timothy W. Feeley of von Briesen, Purtell & Roper, S.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13518 - 2005-03-31

Dwayne G. Thomas v. David M. Schwarz
the evidence was such that the division might reasonably make the order or determination in question. Von Arx v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18649 - 2005-06-21