Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 391 - 400 of 1260 for win.
Search results 391 - 400 of 1260 for win.
State v. Sylvester Neasman
that they would not win the motions. No basis exists to permit plea withdrawal because Neasman was not denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4324 - 2005-03-31
that they would not win the motions. No basis exists to permit plea withdrawal because Neasman was not denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4324 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” with an affirmative showing. In other words, Beahm’s argument seems to be that he wins on prejudice because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108713 - 2017-09-21
” with an affirmative showing. In other words, Beahm’s argument seems to be that he wins on prejudice because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108713 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. You will not win. I will have your head”; he slammed his hand on the table and told her he would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55391 - 2014-09-15
. You will not win. I will have your head”; he slammed his hand on the table and told her he would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55391 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. In other words, Beahm’s argument seems to be that he wins on prejudice because the State failed to offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108713 - 2014-03-05
. In other words, Beahm’s argument seems to be that he wins on prejudice because the State failed to offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108713 - 2014-03-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of incurring the winning party’s attorney fees and litigation costs. Falk responds that neither party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69856 - 2014-09-15
of incurring the winning party’s attorney fees and litigation costs. Falk responds that neither party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69856 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Sylvester Neasman
. Thus, Neasman was not prejudiced by trial counsel’s advisement that they would not win the motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4324 - 2017-09-19
. Thus, Neasman was not prejudiced by trial counsel’s advisement that they would not win the motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4324 - 2017-09-19
William E. Johnson v. Donna M. Johnson
to an interest in the lottery winnings. See id. at 434-35, 482 N.W.2d at 137. “[S]he [was] entitled only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14312 - 2005-03-31
to an interest in the lottery winnings. See id. at 434-35, 482 N.W.2d at 137. “[S]he [was] entitled only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14312 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
deficient performance, he has not alleged sufficient facts to demonstrate prejudice. I. Taking the “no-win
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77697 - 2012-02-06
deficient performance, he has not alleged sufficient facts to demonstrate prejudice. I. Taking the “no-win
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77697 - 2012-02-06
CA Blank Order
, “There’s no win, Your Honor.” The circuit court explained that it did not want to accept Green’s plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97417 - 2013-05-23
, “There’s no win, Your Honor.” The circuit court explained that it did not want to accept Green’s plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97417 - 2013-05-23
Sanfelippo Environmental Construction, LLC v. Mews Companies, Inc.
an affirmative judgment in his or her favor or win the lawsuit in all respects. It is implicit in the definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14586 - 2005-03-31
an affirmative judgment in his or her favor or win the lawsuit in all respects. It is implicit in the definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14586 - 2005-03-31