Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3901 - 3910 of 92951 for a v i.
Search results 3901 - 3910 of 92951 for a v i.
COURT OF APPEALS
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. James N. Walters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135550 - 2015-02-24
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. James N. Walters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135550 - 2015-02-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. JAMES N. WALTERS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135550 - 2017-09-21
, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. JAMES N. WALTERS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135550 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the term of this sentence; but now State v. Hernandez [sic—Fernandez?] says I don’t have to order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104165 - 2017-09-21
the term of this sentence; but now State v. Hernandez [sic—Fernandez?] says I don’t have to order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104165 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
State v. Hernandez [sic—Fernandez?] says I don’t have to order this then I have to consider all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104165 - 2013-11-12
State v. Hernandez [sic—Fernandez?] says I don’t have to order this then I have to consider all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104165 - 2013-11-12
[PDF]
State v. Michael T. Morgan
, as required under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). Consequently, I would reverse the decision of the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16869 - 2017-09-21
, as required under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). Consequently, I would reverse the decision of the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16869 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael T. Morgan
" that the defendant was armed, as required under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). Consequently, I would reverse
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16869 - 2005-03-31
" that the defendant was armed, as required under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). Consequently, I would reverse
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16869 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-RESPONDENT, V. HAROLD L. WILCHER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=308953 - 2020-12-02
-RESPONDENT, V. HAROLD L. WILCHER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=308953 - 2020-12-02
[PDF]
2025XX001330 - 2025-11-25 Court Order (Denied Recusal of Justice Crawford)
NO. 2025XX1330 WIS. BUSINESS LEADERS FOR DEMOCRACY V. WIS. ELECTIONS COMM’N L.C.#2025CV2252
/supreme/docs/25xx1330crawford.pdf - 2025-11-25
NO. 2025XX1330 WIS. BUSINESS LEADERS FOR DEMOCRACY V. WIS. ELECTIONS COMM’N L.C.#2025CV2252
/supreme/docs/25xx1330crawford.pdf - 2025-11-25
[PDF]
Attorney Jeffrey A. Mandell of Stafford Rosenbaum
, as well as the areas of confusion that the proposed rule change will leave unresolved. I. The Court
/scrules/docs/2301_attorneycomments.pdf - 2023-03-02
, as well as the areas of confusion that the proposed rule change will leave unresolved. I. The Court
/scrules/docs/2301_attorneycomments.pdf - 2023-03-02
[PDF]
May a judge hear cases in which attorneys from the law firm in which the judge's niece practices
and Employees, subchapter III of Ch. 19 of the statutes. I hereby certify that this is Formal Opinion
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=879 - 2017-09-20
and Employees, subchapter III of Ch. 19 of the statutes. I hereby certify that this is Formal Opinion
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=879 - 2017-09-20