Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3901 - 3910 of 19831 for inmates search.
Search results 3901 - 3910 of 19831 for inmates search.
[PDF]
NOTICE
pursuant to three search warrants. The first 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36547 - 2014-09-15
pursuant to three search warrants. The first 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36547 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
pursuant to three search warrants. The first two warrants, issued in Marathon County, erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36547 - 2009-05-26
pursuant to three search warrants. The first two warrants, issued in Marathon County, erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36547 - 2009-05-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
it denied two of his motions to suppress evidence obtained as a result of the search of his home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=735399 - 2023-12-05
it denied two of his motions to suppress evidence obtained as a result of the search of his home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=735399 - 2023-12-05
State v. Wendell L. Gaines
lawfully searched Gaines's notebook; (2) whether the police lawfully seized his car; (3) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7868 - 2005-03-31
lawfully searched Gaines's notebook; (2) whether the police lawfully seized his car; (3) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7868 - 2005-03-31
State v. Nathan T. Moore
to conduct a protective search of his person during a temporary stop pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 968.24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7447 - 2005-03-31
to conduct a protective search of his person during a temporary stop pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 968.24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7447 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence found by the police during a warrantless search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=998345 - 2025-08-20
erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence found by the police during a warrantless search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=998345 - 2025-08-20
State v. Eugene Thomas
and drug paraphernalia. The evidence which resulted in the conviction was seized during a probation search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12142 - 2005-03-31
and drug paraphernalia. The evidence which resulted in the conviction was seized during a probation search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12142 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
should have suppressed drug evidence because, he claims, police unlawfully searched his shoes during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87110 - 2012-09-17
should have suppressed drug evidence because, he claims, police unlawfully searched his shoes during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87110 - 2012-09-17
[PDF]
State v. Eugene Thomas
in the conviction was seized during a probation search of Thomas’ NO. 97-0584-CR 2 residence.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12142 - 2017-09-21
in the conviction was seized during a probation search of Thomas’ NO. 97-0584-CR 2 residence.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12142 - 2017-09-21
State v. Delano J. O'Brien
of his motion to suppress evidence obtained during a search of his premises, from judgments of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11595 - 2005-03-31
of his motion to suppress evidence obtained during a search of his premises, from judgments of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11595 - 2005-03-31