Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3901 - 3910 of 20930 for word.
Search results 3901 - 3910 of 20930 for word.
COURT OF APPEALS
separately, and that he had DL explain the right in his own words after he read each right. Kopcha wrote
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29903 - 2007-08-06
separately, and that he had DL explain the right in his own words after he read each right. Kopcha wrote
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29903 - 2007-08-06
[PDF]
State v. Gwen L.P.
, the trial court used, in part, the words of the amended statute. It did so, however, in addition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10488 - 2017-09-20
, the trial court used, in part, the words of the amended statute. It did so, however, in addition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10488 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI App 130
, ordinary, and accepted meaning,” and give “technical or specially-defined words or phrases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70096 - 2014-09-15
, ordinary, and accepted meaning,” and give “technical or specially-defined words or phrases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70096 - 2014-09-15
State v. Christ Groh
885.235(3), Stats. It is on the meaning of the words “the effect” that Groh bases his claim of error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14635 - 2005-03-31
885.235(3), Stats. It is on the meaning of the words “the effect” that Groh bases his claim of error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14635 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and experience. Id. at 423-24 (citations omitted). In other words, when viewed objectively, the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181182 - 2017-09-21
and experience. Id. at 423-24 (citations omitted). In other words, when viewed objectively, the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181182 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, that they were a subsidiary. I don’t recall the exact words. But it was our understanding from this business
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144422 - 2015-07-13
, that they were a subsidiary. I don’t recall the exact words. But it was our understanding from this business
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144422 - 2015-07-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
the officer said “expired” and not “suspended.” We are not convinced that the use of different words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54341 - 2014-09-15
the officer said “expired” and not “suspended.” We are not convinced that the use of different words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54341 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
court did not say the “magic words” that it was not bound by sentence recommendations—the court never
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989591 - 2025-07-30
court did not say the “magic words” that it was not bound by sentence recommendations—the court never
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989591 - 2025-07-30
COURT OF APPEALS
. cites to no authority requiring specific words to move the court for an extension under § 51.20(10)(e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36121 - 2009-04-08
. cites to no authority requiring specific words to move the court for an extension under § 51.20(10)(e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36121 - 2009-04-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
intention[al]? In other words, you intended to do that and you are not contesting that fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143768 - 2017-09-21
intention[al]? In other words, you intended to do that and you are not contesting that fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143768 - 2017-09-21