Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39011 - 39020 of 54897 for n c.
Search results 39011 - 39020 of 54897 for n c.
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 180, 186 n.4, 577 N.W.2d 794 (1998), or that the State nonetheless failed to prove that Mims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74632 - 2005-03-31
Wis. 2d 180, 186 n.4, 577 N.W.2d 794 (1998), or that the State nonetheless failed to prove that Mims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74632 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
/A Adver., Inc., 102 Wis. 2d 305, 306, n.1, 306 N.W.2d 292 (Ct. App. 1981). [3] This is not the complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4659 - 2005-03-31
/A Adver., Inc., 102 Wis. 2d 305, 306, n.1, 306 N.W.2d 292 (Ct. App. 1981). [3] This is not the complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4659 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 137, 142 (1999)). Bucki, 393 Wis. 2d 434, ¶52 n.22. ¶6 Beyond that, Sypher faults the expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013584 - 2025-09-25
. 137, 142 (1999)). Bucki, 393 Wis. 2d 434, ¶52 n.22. ¶6 Beyond that, Sypher faults the expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013584 - 2025-09-25
State v. Harry L. Gant
closing argument. The prosecutor stated: [I]n order to acquit Harry Gant, you must believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5963 - 2010-07-06
closing argument. The prosecutor stated: [I]n order to acquit Harry Gant, you must believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5963 - 2010-07-06
Johnny Lacy, Jr. v. James LaBelle
is presented by the parties’ respective evidentiary facts. See id. at 682-83 & n.2, 550 N.W.2d at 137. Based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12496 - 2005-03-31
is presented by the parties’ respective evidentiary facts. See id. at 682-83 & n.2, 550 N.W.2d at 137. Based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12496 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jamal Purifoy
). As Purifoy correctly argues on appeal, “[n]owhere does the record disclose Purifoy's adoption, either express
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9077 - 2005-03-31
). As Purifoy correctly argues on appeal, “[n]owhere does the record disclose Purifoy's adoption, either express
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9077 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously exercised its discretion. State v. Plymesser, 172 Wis. 2d 583, 585-86 n.1, 493 N.W.2d 367 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26706 - 2006-10-09
erroneously exercised its discretion. State v. Plymesser, 172 Wis. 2d 583, 585-86 n.1, 493 N.W.2d 367 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26706 - 2006-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing. State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶43 n.11, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d 197. A defendant has a due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69082 - 2011-08-03
sentencing. State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶43 n.11, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d 197. A defendant has a due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69082 - 2011-08-03
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 305, 306 n.1, 306 N.W.2d 292 (Ct. App. 1981) (issues not argued on appeal are deemed abandoned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80278 - 2012-04-02
Wis. 2d 305, 306 n.1, 306 N.W.2d 292 (Ct. App. 1981) (issues not argued on appeal are deemed abandoned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80278 - 2012-04-02
COURT OF APPEALS
) (“[A]n officer may make an investigative stop if the officer ‘reasonably suspects’ that a person has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43666 - 2009-11-18
) (“[A]n officer may make an investigative stop if the officer ‘reasonably suspects’ that a person has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43666 - 2009-11-18