Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39021 - 39030 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 39021 - 39030 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Susan M. Curtis
. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J.[1] Following the denial of her motion to suppress, Susan M. Curtis pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2939 - 2005-03-31
. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J.[1] Following the denial of her motion to suppress, Susan M. Curtis pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2939 - 2005-03-31
Didion, Inc. v. Ervin Prohaska
that the summary judgment motion brought by Didion should be granted. We agree. Prohaska
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13348 - 2005-03-31
that the summary judgment motion brought by Didion should be granted. We agree. Prohaska
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13348 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
referencing 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1996).[2] In June 2006, the County filed a motion in limine asking the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33787 - 2008-08-18
referencing 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1996).[2] In June 2006, the County filed a motion in limine asking the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33787 - 2008-08-18
State v. Kendric Jermaine Winters
summarily denying his motion for postconviction relief. The issue is whether postconviction counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25833 - 2006-08-29
summarily denying his motion for postconviction relief. The issue is whether postconviction counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25833 - 2006-08-29
State v. David W. Stokes
, and two counts of possession of a firearm by a felon, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7784 - 2005-03-31
, and two counts of possession of a firearm by a felon, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7784 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that his pretrial motion to suppress should have been granted because the traffic stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51219 - 2005-03-31
argues that his pretrial motion to suppress should have been granted because the traffic stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51219 - 2005-03-31
State v. James J. Peckham
postconviction motion. Peckham claims: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in excluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5318 - 2013-10-15
postconviction motion. Peckham claims: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in excluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5318 - 2013-10-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
-08 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2010AP864-CR 2 improperly denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55300 - 2014-09-15
-08 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2010AP864-CR 2 improperly denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55300 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion for plea withdrawal or resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76597 - 2014-09-15
also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion for plea withdrawal or resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76597 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that “the circuit court should grant the State’s restoration motion unless Poehnelt presents ‘compelling equitable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71743 - 2011-10-03
that “the circuit court should grant the State’s restoration motion unless Poehnelt presents ‘compelling equitable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71743 - 2011-10-03