Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39021 - 39030 of 82834 for case search.
Search results 39021 - 39030 of 82834 for case search.
State v. Marvin C. Seay
2002 WI App 37 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 00-3490-CR 00-3530
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3432 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 37 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 00-3490-CR 00-3530
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3432 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph J.J.
N.W.2d 651, 653 (1979). With this law in place, we now turn to the facts of this case. We begin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10814 - 2017-09-20
N.W.2d 651, 653 (1979). With this law in place, we now turn to the facts of this case. We begin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10814 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion to dismiss based on all of the facts of this case. BACKGROUND ¶2 The parties stipulated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90208 - 2012-12-05
discretion to dismiss based on all of the facts of this case. BACKGROUND ¶2 The parties stipulated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90208 - 2012-12-05
State v. Ronnie C. Barnes
in the instant case, Barnes’s probation in the prior case was revoked. Barnes filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14283 - 2005-03-31
in the instant case, Barnes’s probation in the prior case was revoked. Barnes filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14283 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Daniel Harr v. Gary McCaughtry
the record has been returned. ¶9 In support of this argument, the respondents cite two cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16293 - 2017-09-21
the record has been returned. ¶9 In support of this argument, the respondents cite two cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16293 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 317 Wis. 2d 161, 765 N.W.2d 794. During the plea colloquy in this case, the court did not mention
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123008 - 2014-10-08
, 317 Wis. 2d 161, 765 N.W.2d 794. During the plea colloquy in this case, the court did not mention
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123008 - 2014-10-08
[PDF]
State v. Juan B. Garcia
and remand the case for a new trial. ¶2 The facts are undisputed. On December 14, 2002, Garcia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6313 - 2017-09-19
and remand the case for a new trial. ¶2 The facts are undisputed. On December 14, 2002, Garcia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6313 - 2017-09-19
State v. Allan N.
and was found in default. Allan contested the petition and his TPR case was tried before a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12254 - 2005-03-31
and was found in default. Allan contested the petition and his TPR case was tried before a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12254 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943969 - 2025-04-22
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943969 - 2025-04-22
[PDF]
State v. Allan N.
the petition and his TPR case was tried before a jury. On October 29, 1996, the jury, with one member
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12254 - 2017-09-21
the petition and his TPR case was tried before a jury. On October 29, 1996, the jury, with one member
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12254 - 2017-09-21