Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39021 - 39030 of 68288 for law.
Search results 39021 - 39030 of 68288 for law.
Charles T. Wagner v. Madison Board of Police and Fire Commissioners
Interpretation of a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo. Carroll v. Ansley, 2001 WI App 120
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3272 - 2005-03-31
Interpretation of a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo. Carroll v. Ansley, 2001 WI App 120
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3272 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Dunn v. Gerald J. Trainor
of law subject to de novo review. Id. No. 01-0474 4 ¶8 There is no question that a police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3631 - 2017-09-19
of law subject to de novo review. Id. No. 01-0474 4 ¶8 There is no question that a police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3631 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of law this court decides independently. Id., ¶33. If the facts do not constitute a new factor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251695 - 2019-12-23
of law this court decides independently. Id., ¶33. If the facts do not constitute a new factor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251695 - 2019-12-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
will sustain a conviction unless the evidence is so insufficient “that it can be said as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203352 - 2017-11-22
will sustain a conviction unless the evidence is so insufficient “that it can be said as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203352 - 2017-11-22
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
not be cited as precedent or authority, except to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99345 - 2013-07-10
not be cited as precedent or authority, except to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99345 - 2013-07-10
[PDF]
State v. Michael P. Flunker
“is not an issue to be determined at a refusal hearing.” Because we conclude the stop was lawful, we do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2781 - 2017-09-19
“is not an issue to be determined at a refusal hearing.” Because we conclude the stop was lawful, we do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2781 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Christopher King v. Sonia G. King
by which the facts of record and the law relied upon are stated and considered together. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12316 - 2017-09-21
by which the facts of record and the law relied upon are stated and considered together. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12316 - 2017-09-21
State v. Douglas T. Meyer
a sentence in excess of what is otherwise prescribed by law. See State v. Harris, 119 Wis. 2d 612, 619, 350
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3810 - 2005-03-31
a sentence in excess of what is otherwise prescribed by law. See State v. Harris, 119 Wis. 2d 612, 619, 350
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3810 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to impose the administrative warning are not supported by the record, and that Wisconsin law regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145377 - 2015-07-29
to impose the administrative warning are not supported by the record, and that Wisconsin law regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145377 - 2015-07-29
Christopher King v. Sonia G. King
process by which the facts of record and the law relied upon are stated and considered together. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12316 - 2005-03-31
process by which the facts of record and the law relied upon are stated and considered together. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12316 - 2005-03-31