Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39021 - 39030 of 83557 for simple case search.

Walworth County Department of Health & Human Services v. Carl H.
requiring statutory interpretation, our review is de novo. We understand this case to be controlled by Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3024 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
This case requires an examination of whether there existed reasonable suspicion to support a traffic stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33774 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Walworth County Department of Health & Human Services v. Carl H.
understand this case to be controlled by WIS. STAT. § 48.426(2), which states: The best interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3024 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Daniel Janusz v. Bryan J. Olen
complaint alleging slander. Janusz claims the trial court erred in granting the motion because this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14085 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
plea. On October 28, 2014, Sheedy wrote the court and asked to reopen his case, though he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142621 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Donald S. Eisenberg v.
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 82-1914-D and 89-0596-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16841 - 2017-09-21

James P. Brennan v. Midwest Security Insurance Company
the circumstances of this case to view the statute of limitations commencing when [Brennan] ceased all work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13351 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Michael L. Sellers
-defense. The trial court granted the State's motion for joinder and the case was tried to a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9319 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Douglas Maug
and cause remanded with directions. SUNDBY, J. In this case, the trial court was faced with a dilemma
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7896 - 2017-09-19

State v. Harrison M. Marcum
it sentenced him. In either case, we affirm the order of the circuit court. ¶5 In order to establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25003 - 2006-05-02