Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39031 - 39040 of 44386 for name change.

COURT OF APPEALS
, and that a subsequent ruling concerning the use of the protocol changed the ability to use that protocol in other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79150 - 2012-03-05

State v. Calvin R. Mitchell
who elicited this testimony from Malloy on cross-examination. Thus, he cannot now change his strategy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4024 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
. 3 Effective July 1, 2016, substantial changes were made to Supreme Court Rule 20:1.15, the "trust
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222212 - 2018-10-16

[PDF] Racine County Department of Human Services v. Kamilla F.
for psychological examinations during the trial amount to a change of trial strategy. A deliberate choice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7244 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
requirements to change from ‘second class’ to ‘first class,’ it has not chosen to do so.”). Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56776 - 2014-09-15

James Mews v. Wisconsin Department of Commerce
be estopped from changing its position and reimbursing for only one occurrence. DOC Application of the PECFA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6033 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Robert D. Hanson
followed with the observation that a recent change in the chair’s position of the parole commission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15001 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Robert Junior Carr
.” Gallion, 270 Wis. 2d 535, ¶¶8, 76. In any event, the Gallion court did “not make any momentous changes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18142 - 2017-09-21

State v. David J. Lenz
support the child. This does not change the purpose and nature of the obligation that is the focus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15331 - 2005-03-31

Greendale Education Assocation v. Greendale School District
that Wittlieff simply “didn’t get it” – meaning Wittlieff failed to recognize the changing social norms regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4651 - 2005-03-31