Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39031 - 39040 of 65039 for timed.
Search results 39031 - 39040 of 65039 for timed.
07AP2039 State v. John E. Gobis.doc
, and that it really wouldn’t be worth the time to go—to undergo a subsequent test.” He concluded his direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31980 - 2011-08-04
, and that it really wouldn’t be worth the time to go—to undergo a subsequent test.” He concluded his direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31980 - 2011-08-04
COURT OF APPEALS
that he never had a contract with Bablick and that he timely performed the contract he had with Da Pa Do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90648 - 2015-06-17
that he never had a contract with Bablick and that he timely performed the contract he had with Da Pa Do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90648 - 2015-06-17
COURT OF APPEALS
the restitution obligation is raised for the first time on appeal, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Aponte pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77699 - 2012-02-06
the restitution obligation is raised for the first time on appeal, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Aponte pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77699 - 2012-02-06
Allen J. Pronschinske v. Rupinder Singh, M.D.
myocarditis. Therefore, in their view, timely hospitalization and treatment would not have saved Karen. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4261 - 2005-03-31
myocarditis. Therefore, in their view, timely hospitalization and treatment would not have saved Karen. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4261 - 2005-03-31
James R. Schilling v. State of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
had also been subject to DNR approval. At about the same time, a DNR warden observed what she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6856 - 2005-03-31
had also been subject to DNR approval. At about the same time, a DNR warden observed what she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6856 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge at the time of original
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145051 - 2009-11-16
highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge at the time of original
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145051 - 2009-11-16
Debra J.S. v. Thomas L.
current on that obligation ever since. At the time of the judgment, the tax intercept statute, § 46.255(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11007 - 2008-12-29
current on that obligation ever since. At the time of the judgment, the tax intercept statute, § 46.255(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11007 - 2008-12-29
COURT OF APPEALS
. Owens did not pursue a timely direct appeal from the conviction. However, after the revocation of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34768 - 2008-04-29
. Owens did not pursue a timely direct appeal from the conviction. However, after the revocation of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34768 - 2008-04-29
Orville Oney v. Leroy Nennig, Jr.
that he did not timely file a notice of circumstances. He argues that § 893.80(1), Stats., does not apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8220 - 2005-03-31
that he did not timely file a notice of circumstances. He argues that § 893.80(1), Stats., does not apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8220 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to withdraw his plea because Galvin knew at the time he pled that the circuit court was not bound by the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56489 - 2010-11-09
to withdraw his plea because Galvin knew at the time he pled that the circuit court was not bound by the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56489 - 2010-11-09