Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39041 - 39050 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 39041 - 39050 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals the order denying his postconviction motion for plea withdrawal.[2] Brown argues he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85491 - 2012-07-30
appeals the order denying his postconviction motion for plea withdrawal.[2] Brown argues he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85491 - 2012-07-30
State v. David Allen Bruski
HOOVER, P.J. The State appeals an order granting David Allen Bruski’s motion to suppress physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21227 - 2006-05-14
HOOVER, P.J. The State appeals an order granting David Allen Bruski’s motion to suppress physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21227 - 2006-05-14
COURT OF APPEALS
the motion, stating that sitting “behind the motor vehicle with the motor running is sufficient.” Dix also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91502 - 2013-01-14
the motion, stating that sitting “behind the motor vehicle with the motor running is sufficient.” Dix also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91502 - 2013-01-14
COURT OF APPEALS
the area. ¶5 The jury found Daniels guilty. Daniels brought a postconviction motion, alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60101 - 2012-09-04
the area. ¶5 The jury found Daniels guilty. Daniels brought a postconviction motion, alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60101 - 2012-09-04
SCR CHAPTER 22
a motion with the supreme court requesting that the court order the respondent to show cause why his or her
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76343 - 2012-01-08
a motion with the supreme court requesting that the court order the respondent to show cause why his or her
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76343 - 2012-01-08
[PDF]
WI 32
filed a motion to compel discovery of the defense expert's report. This motion included Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80292 - 2014-09-15
filed a motion to compel discovery of the defense expert's report. This motion included Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80292 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 89
the Respondents’ motion to dismiss. We hold that WIS. STAT. § 893.57, which sets forth the limitations period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180505 - 2017-09-21
the Respondents’ motion to dismiss. We hold that WIS. STAT. § 893.57, which sets forth the limitations period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180505 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
filed a motion to compel discovery of the defense expert's report. This motion included Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80292 - 2012-06-17
filed a motion to compel discovery of the defense expert's report. This motion included Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80292 - 2012-06-17
SCR CHAPTER 22
a motion with the supreme court requesting that the court order the respondent to show cause why his or her
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51685 - 2010-06-30
a motion with the supreme court requesting that the court order the respondent to show cause why his or her
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51685 - 2010-06-30
State v. James Curtis Dillard
second-degree intentional homicide of Brian Cunnigan, and from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9842 - 2005-03-31
second-degree intentional homicide of Brian Cunnigan, and from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9842 - 2005-03-31