Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39051 - 39060 of 64954 for or b.

COURT OF APPEALS
. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] It is not clear whether the trial court understood that Joann’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36430 - 2009-05-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5. 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798420 - 2024-05-08

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. By the Court.—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)4.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989710 - 2025-07-30

State v. John G. Anderson
)(b)5. [1] In light of Anderson’s 10 prior convictions, counsel reasonably chose to rely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16301 - 2005-03-31

State v. Eugene Nichols
and order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14094 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Roger A. Urbick
. This opinion will not be published. See RULE 809.23(1)(b)4, STATS. OpinionCaseNumber
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14964 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Gladys Jean Jones v. Eddie Jones
with directions. This opinion will not be published. See RULE 809.23(1)(b)5, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13611 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). [2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91909 - 2013-01-22

[PDF] State v. Allen F. Ringelstetter
will not be published. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)4. AppealNo AddtlCap Panel2 2017-09-19T22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6000 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160965 - 2017-09-21