Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39071 - 39080 of 91026 for civil+disposition+summary+county.
Search results 39071 - 39080 of 91026 for civil+disposition+summary+county.
State v. Trent N.
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Fond du Lac County: JOHN W. MICKIEWICZ, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11266 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Fond du Lac County: JOHN W. MICKIEWICZ, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11266 - 2005-03-31
State v. Trent N.
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Fond du Lac County: JOHN W. MICKIEWICZ, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11267 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Fond du Lac County: JOHN W. MICKIEWICZ, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11267 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Jefferson County: WILLIAM F. HUE, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249147 - 2019-10-28
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Jefferson County: WILLIAM F. HUE, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249147 - 2019-10-28
[PDF]
State v. Trent N.
., RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Fond du Lac County: JOHN W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11267 - 2017-09-19
., RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Fond du Lac County: JOHN W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11267 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Trent N.
., RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Fond du Lac County: JOHN W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11266 - 2017-09-19
., RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Fond du Lac County: JOHN W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11266 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Petitioners' Memorandum of Law
that has cost the state in dollars, time, and civility.” Baldus v. Members of Wis. Gov’t Accountability Bd
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_petitioneresmemo.pdf - 2023-10-16
that has cost the state in dollars, time, and civility.” Baldus v. Members of Wis. Gov’t Accountability Bd
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_petitioneresmemo.pdf - 2023-10-16
Certification
agreement. Friedlen in turn moved for summary judgment, claiming that the agreement was invalid because
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110321 - 2014-04-14
agreement. Friedlen in turn moved for summary judgment, claiming that the agreement was invalid because
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110321 - 2014-04-14
[PDF]
Certification
covenant agreement. Friedlen in turn moved for summary judgment, claiming that the agreement
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110321 - 2017-09-21
covenant agreement. Friedlen in turn moved for summary judgment, claiming that the agreement
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110321 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 17
ON BRIEFS: ORAL ARGUMENT: November 3, 2009 SOURCE OF APPEAL: COURT: Circuit COUNTY: La
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48193 - 2014-09-15
ON BRIEFS: ORAL ARGUMENT: November 3, 2009 SOURCE OF APPEAL: COURT: Circuit COUNTY: La
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48193 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
United States District Court for the District of Columbia Order
in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is ORDERED that the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. 26
/supreme/docs/us_distcourt_dcord.pdf - 2021-05-21
in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is ORDERED that the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. 26
/supreme/docs/us_distcourt_dcord.pdf - 2021-05-21