Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39091 - 39100 of 98406 for court records search online.
Search results 39091 - 39100 of 98406 for court records search online.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, Jack’s trial counsel informed the court that she had discussed the records with Oakes over the phone
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1104548 - 2026-04-14
, Jack’s trial counsel informed the court that she had discussed the records with Oakes over the phone
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1104548 - 2026-04-14
[PDF]
State v. Albert Steven Winfrey
and questioning from the court, Winfrey entered a no contest plea. The record is clear that Winfrey pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7907 - 2017-09-19
and questioning from the court, Winfrey entered a no contest plea. The record is clear that Winfrey pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7907 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, Jack’s trial counsel informed the court that she had discussed the records with Oakes over the phone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1104548 - 2026-04-14
, Jack’s trial counsel informed the court that she had discussed the records with Oakes over the phone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1104548 - 2026-04-14
State v. Albert Steven Winfrey
with counsel and questioning from the court, Winfrey entered a no contest plea. The record is clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7907 - 2005-03-31
with counsel and questioning from the court, Winfrey entered a no contest plea. The record is clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7907 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to which Hardy has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823214 - 2024-07-09
to which Hardy has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823214 - 2024-07-09
State v. Kenneth Parrish
the record of the first ch. 980 trial. He contends, therefore, that the trial court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3038 - 2005-03-31
the record of the first ch. 980 trial. He contends, therefore, that the trial court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3038 - 2005-03-31
Kenosha County DHS v. Katrina R.
on and off the record. It then stated: “So, the Court’s going to schedule this for February 9th and toll
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20986 - 2006-01-16
on and off the record. It then stated: “So, the Court’s going to schedule this for February 9th and toll
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20986 - 2006-01-16
[PDF]
Kenosha County DHS v. Katrina R.
that the reason stated by the court—congestion of the attorneys’ calendars—is not supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20986 - 2017-09-21
that the reason stated by the court—congestion of the attorneys’ calendars—is not supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20986 - 2017-09-21
State v. Randolph S. Bauernfeind
on the record, the trial court also properly found that trial counsel adequately advised Bauernfeind that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11554 - 2005-03-31
on the record, the trial court also properly found that trial counsel adequately advised Bauernfeind that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11554 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Richard Alva v. Herb Fitzgerald Company, Inc.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE September 8, 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12610 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE September 8, 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12610 - 2017-09-21