Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3911 - 3920 of 30021 for de.
Search results 3911 - 3920 of 30021 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law an appellate court reviews de novo. State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79, ¶18, 336 Wis. 2d 358
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234713 - 2019-02-20
is a question of law an appellate court reviews de novo. State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79, ¶18, 336 Wis. 2d 358
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234713 - 2019-02-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. See State v. Kelty, 2006 WI 101, ¶13, 294 Wis. 2d 62, 716 N.W.2d 886
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181042 - 2017-09-21
that we review de novo. See State v. Kelty, 2006 WI 101, ¶13, 294 Wis. 2d 62, 716 N.W.2d 886
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181042 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Israel Saldana
of law which we review de novo. See id. The right to effective assistance of counsel applies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11532 - 2017-09-19
of law which we review de novo. See id. The right to effective assistance of counsel applies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11532 - 2017-09-19
2008 WI APP 114
summary judgment de novo, without deference to the trial court’s conclusions. Lyons, 207 Wis. 2d at 458
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33185 - 2011-06-14
summary judgment de novo, without deference to the trial court’s conclusions. Lyons, 207 Wis. 2d at 458
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33185 - 2011-06-14
COURT OF APPEALS
counterclaims. Discussion ¶9 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142482 - 2015-05-27
counterclaims. Discussion ¶9 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142482 - 2015-05-27
Maurice Fort Greer v. Lawrence Stahowiak
de novo. State ex rel. Milwaukee Police Ass’n v. Jones, 2000 WI App 146, ¶11, 237 Wis. 2d 840, 615
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19737 - 2005-10-27
de novo. State ex rel. Milwaukee Police Ass’n v. Jones, 2000 WI App 146, ¶11, 237 Wis. 2d 840, 615
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19737 - 2005-10-27
[PDF]
WI APP 26
) to undisputed facts. We interpret and apply statutes de novo. See Ashford v. DHA, 177 Wis. 2d 34, 39-40, 501
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35219 - 2014-09-15
) to undisputed facts. We interpret and apply statutes de novo. See Ashford v. DHA, 177 Wis. 2d 34, 39-40, 501
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35219 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the municipal court’s decision denying the motion to reopen de novo. Village of Williams Bay v. Metzl, 124
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1068769 - 2026-01-27
the municipal court’s decision denying the motion to reopen de novo. Village of Williams Bay v. Metzl, 124
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1068769 - 2026-01-27
James A. Billington v. Wilbert C. Oldenhoff
court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, owing no deference to the circuit court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6943 - 2005-03-31
court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, owing no deference to the circuit court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6943 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57439 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57439 - 2014-09-15