Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3911 - 3920 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
be governed by the summary judgment standard that we apply de novo using the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=791994 - 2024-04-23

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
; however, we review de novo a trial court’s conclusion whether a stop and search comported with the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28229 - 2007-02-26

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
judgments and an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: linda m. van de water, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45549 - 2010-02-23

COURT OF APPEALS
those facts establish a substantial change in circumstances is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145747 - 2015-08-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo.” Id. ¶10 The postconviction motion must specifically allege within its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906575 - 2025-01-29

COURT OF APPEALS
lineup taint a subsequent identification is a legal issue that we review de novo. Id. (application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141465 - 2015-05-11

[PDF] Susan Malone v. Daniel G. Gaengel
part of their policy. II. Although assisted by the trial court's analysis, we review de novo its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13855 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey S. Gill
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862, 537 N.W.2d 47 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17950 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of paragraph two. On this topic the court wrote: Paragraph 6 dictates that the De[c]osters would be allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137854 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jeffrey S. Gill
that we review de novo. State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862, 537 N.W.2d 47 (Ct. App. 1995). ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17950 - 2005-05-03